This isn't chick shit, you admit it yourself in this very piece! Everyone likes talking about themselves. The difference isn't between men and women, it's between interesting and boring people. Admittedly, women are much less likely to realize how boring they are. It's not female solipsism, it's just basic self-awareness because of how pretty women and girls have been treated their whole lives: as if what they're talking about is interesting, because the listener has so much more incentive to appear interested. Most ugly women and girls know better, just like men do.
Get a load of this video on how women are unable to understand the POV meme. It is VERY telling of what is (and is not) going through their head. Spooky stuff ...
"In today’s video, we break down the widespread misuse of the POV meme by women and dive into the psychology behind it. Using Lauren Chen’s video, "Women vs the POV Meme," as a starting point, we explore how solipsism and Self-Enhancement Theory influence women’s behavior in dating, social media, and beyond. From the biological differences in how men and women process information to the impact of social media on women’s mental health, we cover it all."
I don’t deny that there is probably a “general”principle or truth here that captures a particular feminine (mostly) trait. But watch that it doesn’t quickly devolve into the flip side of “masculine toxicity.” Can we stop stereotyping both sexes in a negative way so much of the time?
It's an interesting take and definitely food for thought. So thank you for providing an insight into how some men's minds work vs. women's.
Something that struck me is whether female solipsism may be due to how men and women bond with each other and share information so these different style would have a bearing on communication?
For example when going to battle, hunting or doing manual labor etc., clear concise and non ambiguous communication is key as it is efficient, prevents mistakes being made and helps the team achieve a common goal.
With women communication is used to establish mutually beneficial relationships, build community, establish social standing and due to their softer skills, highlight what they bring to an interaction vs. what they can do.
Women used to be raised not be like this, ie to know your actual value and security depends on how OTHERS relate to you and that you should have poise: not let other people read your emotions aetc . When you read older novels there is often one annoying female character acting like how you describe but she is never a protagonist.
Women are programmed to survive. It’s part of the nurturing and caretaking of their children. People, whether men or women, in survivor mode are self absorbed. That’s just the way survival works. Believe me, you don’t want to change this about women. So if they tend to be self absorbed, hey, small annoying price to pay for raising the children. Having said that, communism is feminizing. While collectivism is important to totalitarians, being self absorbed becomes de rigueur.
I remember that in Gone with the Wind Scarlett's uncle told her of something that was going on in the economy, adding that he was sure that she wasn't aware of it because she never took notice of things that didn't affect her personally.
I'm female and find it next to impossible to discuss ideas with most women. One woman howled, "I don't want to talk like that! I want to talk about food, clothes, and men!"
I've observed a strident lack of curiosity.
"Not all!"
OF COURSE NOT ALL.
One also has to tow the party line among women or otherwise be subjected to exile. The rationale for said party line is usually MORAL, and not practical. Like "defunding the police" because those poor black men in prison (for committing crimes!)
What might be the cause of this?
There is a strident difference between men and women, with various shades of gray in between. Women generally know the domestic sphere -- she can find his keys when he can't find them. Men look outward, like their genitalia. Women look inward, like theirs. Therefore, their world is myopic and subject to anecdotal evidence and subjectivity aimed at protecting their "good names" (reputations) and not soiling the discussion with anything that might hurt their children's ears.
Note that the educational system has been mangled into a center of solipsism: fears of "harm", external locus of control, "care" "social emotional learning" and so on, which is making people stupid.
On another note, I find myself reaching for how that event over there touches me, personally, as a means of comprehending it. Putting myself in the character's shoes, for example. What similar experience have I had? If I were in this position, how would I feel? What's the closest I've ever come to that?
That said, perhaps there's a difference in the intention behind the solipsism. Is it stunting the discourse, or trying to understand?
This post REALLY upset some Subaru-Americans. Which is ironic because they should be at home making sandwiches instead of gallivanting on a substack named “Sigma Game”.
I was expecting something about a kitchen or maybe some cats, but not a SANDWICH comment! I almost passed out from the stunning and brave originality displayed here.
Who says men are stupid and shouldn't be allowed to vote? The creativity shown in their internet comments is alone enough to prove that they don't need affirmative action to get into university.
You, sir, are a testament to your parents and I bet your mother is proud of the work she did. She should be. Her life would have been a waste if she didn't produce your and your genius.
One may assert that women shouldn't vote whether allowed to or not, without asserting that women are stupid. It's about the motivations and history, namely the crumbling of once-great societies in waves since they started to vote for the wrong policies, taxes, and expenditures, for the wrong reasons.
Our Forefathers had this figured out 250 years ago: women were required to STFU and make sandwiches while not being allowed to vote. The result? The foundation of the most powerful nation was created.
And subsequently destroyed after allowing women to overwhelmingly vote in support of sodomy, abortion and their own destruction via feminism.
Also far too many feminized and programmed males afraid to speak the obvious truth about women voting.
Hahahahaha I know both men & women like this.
All women have Atleast a little of this. But for some women they live this every moment of their life.
This isn't chick shit, you admit it yourself in this very piece! Everyone likes talking about themselves. The difference isn't between men and women, it's between interesting and boring people. Admittedly, women are much less likely to realize how boring they are. It's not female solipsism, it's just basic self-awareness because of how pretty women and girls have been treated their whole lives: as if what they're talking about is interesting, because the listener has so much more incentive to appear interested. Most ugly women and girls know better, just like men do.
🤮
Get a load of this video on how women are unable to understand the POV meme. It is VERY telling of what is (and is not) going through their head. Spooky stuff ...
"In today’s video, we break down the widespread misuse of the POV meme by women and dive into the psychology behind it. Using Lauren Chen’s video, "Women vs the POV Meme," as a starting point, we explore how solipsism and Self-Enhancement Theory influence women’s behavior in dating, social media, and beyond. From the biological differences in how men and women process information to the impact of social media on women’s mental health, we cover it all."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pkm8qkmHLKE
Looks like adored but too stupid to pick a man
I don’t deny that there is probably a “general”principle or truth here that captures a particular feminine (mostly) trait. But watch that it doesn’t quickly devolve into the flip side of “masculine toxicity.” Can we stop stereotyping both sexes in a negative way so much of the time?
It's an interesting take and definitely food for thought. So thank you for providing an insight into how some men's minds work vs. women's.
Something that struck me is whether female solipsism may be due to how men and women bond with each other and share information so these different style would have a bearing on communication?
For example when going to battle, hunting or doing manual labor etc., clear concise and non ambiguous communication is key as it is efficient, prevents mistakes being made and helps the team achieve a common goal.
With women communication is used to establish mutually beneficial relationships, build community, establish social standing and due to their softer skills, highlight what they bring to an interaction vs. what they can do.
Women used to be raised not be like this, ie to know your actual value and security depends on how OTHERS relate to you and that you should have poise: not let other people read your emotions aetc . When you read older novels there is often one annoying female character acting like how you describe but she is never a protagonist.
Women are programmed to survive. It’s part of the nurturing and caretaking of their children. People, whether men or women, in survivor mode are self absorbed. That’s just the way survival works. Believe me, you don’t want to change this about women. So if they tend to be self absorbed, hey, small annoying price to pay for raising the children. Having said that, communism is feminizing. While collectivism is important to totalitarians, being self absorbed becomes de rigueur.
I remember that in Gone with the Wind Scarlett's uncle told her of something that was going on in the economy, adding that he was sure that she wasn't aware of it because she never took notice of things that didn't affect her personally.
Is she your ex wife because of the fatness or the way she ate?
I'm female and find it next to impossible to discuss ideas with most women. One woman howled, "I don't want to talk like that! I want to talk about food, clothes, and men!"
I've observed a strident lack of curiosity.
"Not all!"
OF COURSE NOT ALL.
One also has to tow the party line among women or otherwise be subjected to exile. The rationale for said party line is usually MORAL, and not practical. Like "defunding the police" because those poor black men in prison (for committing crimes!)
What might be the cause of this?
There is a strident difference between men and women, with various shades of gray in between. Women generally know the domestic sphere -- she can find his keys when he can't find them. Men look outward, like their genitalia. Women look inward, like theirs. Therefore, their world is myopic and subject to anecdotal evidence and subjectivity aimed at protecting their "good names" (reputations) and not soiling the discussion with anything that might hurt their children's ears.
Note that the educational system has been mangled into a center of solipsism: fears of "harm", external locus of control, "care" "social emotional learning" and so on, which is making people stupid.
On another note, I find myself reaching for how that event over there touches me, personally, as a means of comprehending it. Putting myself in the character's shoes, for example. What similar experience have I had? If I were in this position, how would I feel? What's the closest I've ever come to that?
That said, perhaps there's a difference in the intention behind the solipsism. Is it stunting the discourse, or trying to understand?
Women want 2 things:
1) more
2) something else.
This kat lady is hilarious .
This post REALLY upset some Subaru-Americans. Which is ironic because they should be at home making sandwiches instead of gallivanting on a substack named “Sigma Game”.
OH MY GAWD A SANDWICH COMMENT
I was expecting something about a kitchen or maybe some cats, but not a SANDWICH comment! I almost passed out from the stunning and brave originality displayed here.
Who says men are stupid and shouldn't be allowed to vote? The creativity shown in their internet comments is alone enough to prove that they don't need affirmative action to get into university.
You, sir, are a testament to your parents and I bet your mother is proud of the work she did. She should be. Her life would have been a waste if she didn't produce your and your genius.
One may assert that women shouldn't vote whether allowed to or not, without asserting that women are stupid. It's about the motivations and history, namely the crumbling of once-great societies in waves since they started to vote for the wrong policies, taxes, and expenditures, for the wrong reasons.
Our Forefathers had this figured out 250 years ago: women were required to STFU and make sandwiches while not being allowed to vote. The result? The foundation of the most powerful nation was created.
And subsequently destroyed after allowing women to overwhelmingly vote in support of sodomy, abortion and their own destruction via feminism.
Also far too many feminized and programmed males afraid to speak the obvious truth about women voting.
It goes without saying that blacks shouldn’t be allowed to vote.
They can barely remain non-violent in a Popeyes much less make decisions on matters of state.