AR, tank top, and holstered side piece probably adds .8 to 1.4 but would need this with her in blouse and knee length skirt same pose and accessories for more scientific comparison / contrast exercise.
More and more we see why no one was insane enough to give women the vote...until the bloody Kiwis started the chain reaction in the nineteenth century.
The 4B strategy is guaranteed to fail in the long run. We can all do our part to speedrun this by having more children and raising them to not be libtards.
My buddy's wife used to express anxiety about what the other girls would think about her staying home to raise children and homeschool. It was what she wanted to do, but was made to feel bad about it by the women who didn't have the luxury. Misery loves company.
It took about a decade, but its no longer a pressure she feels.
Can anyone opine on where in the SSH George W Bush and Cheney are. Cheney seems gamma for sure. Works behind the scenes and endorsed Harris. George W all I know is retarded.
It’s safe to say Jeb! is Gamma, but I think Dubya and Cheney are most likely Delta or higher. Assuming they aren’t also members of the Homintern, of course.
W is a Bravo. I met him in 1988 when he was his father's consigliere. He was never supposed to be his father's successor, but his brother blew it as Florida governor.
I met Jeb Bush once at an event held at the Wells Fargo Tower in Houston held late 2013 or 2014. It was well before the primary season started. Given what I know now -- gamma.
He did not seem to have SS bodyguards. Neither his wife nor son was there, and no one really talked to him. While it was not an event for him per se, it was a Bio-Tech event IIRC, the fact that no one was chatting him up was very odd. He was just standing alone.
Anyway, I introduced myself and mentioned that my wife knew his son from UT and spoke with him for maybe 3-4 minutes. His lack of charisma was very noticeable. Everything Trump said about him was totally fair.
His body language around his wife says that he is uncomfortable with his height (6’2” iirc), trying to make himself smaller next to his wife, yet photographed up on his toes in the 2016 GOP Debate group photo to look as tall as Trump. Very insecure guy.
He's not 6'2'' my memory is that I was taller than him and I am 6'2''. He was also a bit skinny fat, he would later lose some weight to run for POTUS.
Uncomfortable is a good word to describe him though. It's not that no one spoke with him, but no one really lingered to talk to him -- including me. It just was awkward to talk to him and I'll talk to anyone about anything at any time.
Ha. I didn't even mention Bush Sr., but here's a couple photo of him and Barbara from when they were young, which does indicate to me that Poppy may have been a Gamma:
lol that’s a good analysis. I think honestly it’s a good starting point to see what women they are with, no? Of course someone will bring up an exception.
Cheney had Christian Bale portray him so I am inclined to believe he’s properly bravo but to who? He was def pulling the strings the whole administration.
Obama has to be a lamba since he’s married to Big Mike.
We need the first Omega in the White House, it would be a historic event. 🥹
I went to college in a liberal city where rainbow flags were everywhere, and diversity workshops were just part of the routine. But no matter how often I heard the messaging, my life experience wouldn’t let me fully buy in. I’d sit in those classes thinking, “Sure, this all sounds nice, but nothing I’ve actually seen makes me believe it.” I’m simply too aware of women’s dependence on men for safety.
I’d walk around thinking, “Better check Twitter to find out what I think today!” It started as a joke, but I soon realized just how close to the truth it was. It was infuriating to have conversations hoping for an original thought, only to hear the same recycled Twitter takes everywhere I turned. Resisting this stuff was like a full-time job, and it started years ago when I realized I’m a sucker for flashy packaging and an intriguing color scheme. It’s humbling to recognize how impressionable I am, even now.
My first understanding of programming came in sixth grade, when I read Mission Earth series by L. Ron Hubbard. It hardcore harped on how media and psychiatry manipulate society. I didn’t even know Hubbard had founded a religion, but by the end, I knew exactly what he was up to. That series felt like a confession of every dirty trick in the book. All through the eyes of an unbelievably shitty gamma. It was like getting a tool, almost like the SSH, to see what we’re dealing with behind the scenes. It’s the difference between imagining James Bond saving the world from evil megalomaniacs and realizing the real-life version is a gamma cozying up to Merriam-Webster to tweak a word just enough to alter a law’s meaning.
Years later, what truly clarified things for me was realizing that God's law is written on our hearts. Viewing the world through the lens of Christian morality finally made everything snap into place. Like a fog lifting—the world made sense again. Now, I’m no longer confused and am better at reading through the nonsense.
It’s why The Handmaid’s Tale fantasy is destined to fall through the roof when these women realize only gammas showed up to their party. That’s when the bonnets get thrown down, and they scream, “I’m taking my ball and going HOME!”
On another note, maybe this isn’t the best time, but I still think bonnets should be in style. I mean the Scythian ones, or those cute medieval ones from Michelangelo’s sketches. Adorable! Actually, maybe now is the perfect time.
You are correct! It is so hard as a woman at any age to realize that we really like shiny stuff but that it could be a lie and manipulation. The crowd is our safety net, and we will suppress dissent in order to remain safe. Unfortunately, that leads to easy manipulation by bad actors, as well as a tremendous amount of cognitive dissonance or “intellectual flexibility”. A couple of recent examples:
A) “My body my choice” until I think you can make me sick. It then becomes “you owe it to society to not kill anyone by getting them sick.”
B) Preventing illegal immigration is racist because they just want a better life for themselves and their family. We have more than enough to share. But my child will attend this school because the school’s demographics are >90% White and Asian, the education is better, and the school is safer. That other school 10 miles further away is not acceptable because it is majority (pick a minority) and has a terrible gang and violence problem. My child’s education and future will suffer.
In both scenarios the second statement is acceptable because it is supposedly about someone else. You are helping them. You are not being selfish. That mind set is completely dishonest, but it is taught throughout school to justify truly horrific things and prevent us from seeing the truth.
The Handmaid’s Tale demonstrates that cognitive dissonance to me.
I read the Handmaid’s Tale in high school, for fun, because it was highly recommended. What is baffling is how anyone could read that story and think that it was all the result of a fundamentalist religious society. Everything in it pointed to a society that had embraced hedonism to the point that it collapsed. In order to survive, the society had to restrict and structure the lives of the young women. The young women were enslaved and used to provide the next generation. I know that the author wanted the reader to be appalled by the condition of the handmaiden, but she never looked at the root cause of the collapse.,
Many years later a friend was extolling the virtues of the tv show. I told her I had read the novel and was not interested in the tv series. She started reading the novel but stopped after several chapters and stopped watching the show, as well. She realized how cognitively dissonant the novel was.
It's good that you've figured out how the messaging works. Humans are a known quantity and have been for a long time. Advertisers and propagandists know exactly what buttons to push to get the response that they want. Humans can easily be trained to perform in much the same way a script or macro can be written for a computer. Pushing button A=Behavior 1. That's why you see so many parroting verbatim what they see and hear on the Internet. They're running a subroutine programmed into their subconscious through an electronic interface. Rare is the bird that can open that cage door and fly away.
"No heterosexual marriage, no heterosexual dating, no heterosexual sex, and no childbearing under any circumstances."
This is a luxury product. Poor societies know that they need a new generation. Rich societies that have the delusion that they can import workers will find they are no longer rich societies, as the culture will change.
The good news is that this will burn out, and it will the 4b ladies that will suffer.
GOP needs to message strongly that Republican woman are married, meaning they are attractive enough to extract commitment and resources from good men, where Democrat women are only good for short-term physical pleasure without commitment.
GOP Brides vs Dem Rides.
Make being a Republican woman a status symbol and you will OWN the women’s vote.
But the GOP is too stupid and craven to even think this thought.
The Dems already know this, which is why they work so hard on making American women fat, promiscuous, foul, and debt-ridden. They are manufacturing voters.
@scarletnumber, I respect your decision to stay on topic. I do hope at some future point you can add some thoughtful understanding around social pressure because I think you may have some unique perspective. You are not independent. You self define as Dem, yet you read here. I am wondering how much of an outlier you are. How is it that you came to this site and failed to burst into flames? Humor aside, there is profound, wildly successful, social pressure on the Dem side for cohesion. To this independent, it looks like someone clicks a button on a remote and everyone snaps to it, regardless of how illogical, detrimental and contradictory to previous marching orders. You and others were willing to go against all of that. I hope you will reflect on that. There might be something interesting and useful to learn.
> How is it that you came to this site and failed to burst into flames? Humor aside, there is profound, wildly successful, social pressure on the Dem side for cohesion.
I also read Steve Sailer and I've felt there was an overlap in the themes of Vox Popoli and Steve's blog. The short answer to your question is that there is a sane wing in the Democratic party that doesn't necessarily believe every crackpot left-wing social-justice flavor of the month. We voted for Trump and our older brethren voted for Ronald Reagan.
I am not proud of this, but I do not post under my real name. Not only would I be ostracized from the Democratic Party but as a public employee I could very easily lose my job as well, as I don't have First Amendment rights as a practical matter.
Interesting. Well, thank you for this. I hope you do post some observations on how you can remain under all that pressure, not free to bring your whole self anywhere, choose to stay in the tribe, and yet here you are and there you voted. What ever it is that enables you and your brothers to do that, and it's not lost on me that you said brethren, there must be some kind of SSH observation that rhymes or overlaps. I don't judge you for prudence, it's the reality of human nature and a part of this social pressure story. Good luck to you.
"But the more significant aspect of the chart is that it shows that female political allegiances are malleable... more normal women, those who haven’t gone completely and irretrievably off the deep end, will tend to follow the lead of their boyfriends and husbands over time."
My wife was politically neutral when we started dating with a traditional upbringing. She is now an American Nationalist who champions repatriation and a return to Christian Blasphemy laws. Young men may be surprised how much they change over time, but it takes effort, leadership, and lots of her husband's injected jizz strength.
I voted for kamal@ and I'm a man but I was actually scared that my friends would not like my decision
look up yap dollar rn💀
The strangest kind of favor
Only time a high status man will listen to a woman is if it is in alignment with his agenda, helps him reach his goals, and/or furthers his mission.
However, this type of woman is rare indeed.
I say to the ugly liberal women threatening no sex until men comply, politically - your terms are acceptable.
AR, tank top, and holstered side piece probably adds .8 to 1.4 but would need this with her in blouse and knee length skirt same pose and accessories for more scientific comparison / contrast exercise.
More and more we see why no one was insane enough to give women the vote...until the bloody Kiwis started the chain reaction in the nineteenth century.
To consider that terrorism indeed does work.
Classifying feminists as terrorists...that is a good idea.
Feminism is merely Marxism with tits, so that makes good sense.
The 4B strategy is guaranteed to fail in the long run. We can all do our part to speedrun this by having more children and raising them to not be libtards.
The strongest female advocates of 4B are also the least desirable reproducers anyway, so maybe a silver lining in there somewhere.
My buddy's wife used to express anxiety about what the other girls would think about her staying home to raise children and homeschool. It was what she wanted to do, but was made to feel bad about it by the women who didn't have the luxury. Misery loves company.
It took about a decade, but its no longer a pressure she feels.
Women are hard wired to seek a safe environment where they can fulfill their reproductive imperative.
They instinctually search for a man who will provide it.
That's why if a man leads, his woman will follow.
The challenge lies in leading her well.
Can anyone opine on where in the SSH George W Bush and Cheney are. Cheney seems gamma for sure. Works behind the scenes and endorsed Harris. George W all I know is retarded.
It’s safe to say Jeb! is Gamma, but I think Dubya and Cheney are most likely Delta or higher. Assuming they aren’t also members of the Homintern, of course.
W is a Bravo. I met him in 1988 when he was his father's consigliere. He was never supposed to be his father's successor, but his brother blew it as Florida governor.
I met Jeb Bush once at an event held at the Wells Fargo Tower in Houston held late 2013 or 2014. It was well before the primary season started. Given what I know now -- gamma.
He did not seem to have SS bodyguards. Neither his wife nor son was there, and no one really talked to him. While it was not an event for him per se, it was a Bio-Tech event IIRC, the fact that no one was chatting him up was very odd. He was just standing alone.
Anyway, I introduced myself and mentioned that my wife knew his son from UT and spoke with him for maybe 3-4 minutes. His lack of charisma was very noticeable. Everything Trump said about him was totally fair.
His body language around his wife says that he is uncomfortable with his height (6’2” iirc), trying to make himself smaller next to his wife, yet photographed up on his toes in the 2016 GOP Debate group photo to look as tall as Trump. Very insecure guy.
He's not 6'2'' my memory is that I was taller than him and I am 6'2''. He was also a bit skinny fat, he would later lose some weight to run for POTUS.
Uncomfortable is a good word to describe him though. It's not that no one spoke with him, but no one really lingered to talk to him -- including me. It just was awkward to talk to him and I'll talk to anyone about anything at any time.
> Everything Trump said about him was totally fair.
He married an unattractive woman who doesn't even speak the language
I think starting with what women a man is with or is capable of acquiring is a good starting point for ssh
Not sure if this is right
Very interesting.
Idk I look at the quality of women they’re with as an indicator neither of them are attractive
And don’t forget in Khazhakstan Barbara Bush means to eat the hair from the testicules!
Ha. I didn't even mention Bush Sr., but here's a couple photo of him and Barbara from when they were young, which does indicate to me that Poppy may have been a Gamma:
https://starsgab.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Barbara-Bush-with-her-husband-1024x576.jpg
By way of contrast, here's Dick Cheney on his wedding day, who looks to me like a possible Bravo:
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/2b/8e/75/2b8e7502cf8709fb4ef7b0d38ef1a3c6.jpg
And W. with Laura, which looks pretty mid-range Delta:
https://static01.nyt.com/images/2010/04/29/books/29book/29book-popup.jpg
https://youtu.be/JToOxt_ltuI?si=AZApy1q5-o3MlyrE
lol that’s a good analysis. I think honestly it’s a good starting point to see what women they are with, no? Of course someone will bring up an exception.
Cheney had Christian Bale portray him so I am inclined to believe he’s properly bravo but to who? He was def pulling the strings the whole administration.
Obama has to be a lamba since he’s married to Big Mike.
We need the first Omega in the White House, it would be a historic event. 🥹
I went to college in a liberal city where rainbow flags were everywhere, and diversity workshops were just part of the routine. But no matter how often I heard the messaging, my life experience wouldn’t let me fully buy in. I’d sit in those classes thinking, “Sure, this all sounds nice, but nothing I’ve actually seen makes me believe it.” I’m simply too aware of women’s dependence on men for safety.
I’d walk around thinking, “Better check Twitter to find out what I think today!” It started as a joke, but I soon realized just how close to the truth it was. It was infuriating to have conversations hoping for an original thought, only to hear the same recycled Twitter takes everywhere I turned. Resisting this stuff was like a full-time job, and it started years ago when I realized I’m a sucker for flashy packaging and an intriguing color scheme. It’s humbling to recognize how impressionable I am, even now.
My first understanding of programming came in sixth grade, when I read Mission Earth series by L. Ron Hubbard. It hardcore harped on how media and psychiatry manipulate society. I didn’t even know Hubbard had founded a religion, but by the end, I knew exactly what he was up to. That series felt like a confession of every dirty trick in the book. All through the eyes of an unbelievably shitty gamma. It was like getting a tool, almost like the SSH, to see what we’re dealing with behind the scenes. It’s the difference between imagining James Bond saving the world from evil megalomaniacs and realizing the real-life version is a gamma cozying up to Merriam-Webster to tweak a word just enough to alter a law’s meaning.
Years later, what truly clarified things for me was realizing that God's law is written on our hearts. Viewing the world through the lens of Christian morality finally made everything snap into place. Like a fog lifting—the world made sense again. Now, I’m no longer confused and am better at reading through the nonsense.
It’s why The Handmaid’s Tale fantasy is destined to fall through the roof when these women realize only gammas showed up to their party. That’s when the bonnets get thrown down, and they scream, “I’m taking my ball and going HOME!”
On another note, maybe this isn’t the best time, but I still think bonnets should be in style. I mean the Scythian ones, or those cute medieval ones from Michelangelo’s sketches. Adorable! Actually, maybe now is the perfect time.
You make good points, and you also need an upvote for the bonnet.
I'm all about those old timey bonnets
I've for years lamented that we White Christians deserve better villains, and that was before COVID.
Soros, Bill Gates and Zuck? I was a wimpy nerd in high school and I would still bet on me from then in a deathmatch vs any of them.
Zuck would be a very stupid bet on your part in 2024, but now he seems to be retreating a bit from the villain role. Most disappointing of him.
Fortunately, Gavin "American Psycho" Newsom waits in the wings. So it looks like you'll get your wish.
You are correct! It is so hard as a woman at any age to realize that we really like shiny stuff but that it could be a lie and manipulation. The crowd is our safety net, and we will suppress dissent in order to remain safe. Unfortunately, that leads to easy manipulation by bad actors, as well as a tremendous amount of cognitive dissonance or “intellectual flexibility”. A couple of recent examples:
A) “My body my choice” until I think you can make me sick. It then becomes “you owe it to society to not kill anyone by getting them sick.”
B) Preventing illegal immigration is racist because they just want a better life for themselves and their family. We have more than enough to share. But my child will attend this school because the school’s demographics are >90% White and Asian, the education is better, and the school is safer. That other school 10 miles further away is not acceptable because it is majority (pick a minority) and has a terrible gang and violence problem. My child’s education and future will suffer.
In both scenarios the second statement is acceptable because it is supposedly about someone else. You are helping them. You are not being selfish. That mind set is completely dishonest, but it is taught throughout school to justify truly horrific things and prevent us from seeing the truth.
The Handmaid’s Tale demonstrates that cognitive dissonance to me.
I read the Handmaid’s Tale in high school, for fun, because it was highly recommended. What is baffling is how anyone could read that story and think that it was all the result of a fundamentalist religious society. Everything in it pointed to a society that had embraced hedonism to the point that it collapsed. In order to survive, the society had to restrict and structure the lives of the young women. The young women were enslaved and used to provide the next generation. I know that the author wanted the reader to be appalled by the condition of the handmaiden, but she never looked at the root cause of the collapse.,
Many years later a friend was extolling the virtues of the tv show. I told her I had read the novel and was not interested in the tv series. She started reading the novel but stopped after several chapters and stopped watching the show, as well. She realized how cognitively dissonant the novel was.
Its always the perfect time for bonnets.
Make Picnics Great Again
It's good that you've figured out how the messaging works. Humans are a known quantity and have been for a long time. Advertisers and propagandists know exactly what buttons to push to get the response that they want. Humans can easily be trained to perform in much the same way a script or macro can be written for a computer. Pushing button A=Behavior 1. That's why you see so many parroting verbatim what they see and hear on the Internet. They're running a subroutine programmed into their subconscious through an electronic interface. Rare is the bird that can open that cage door and fly away.
Gammas and their love of "Strong women"
Obsession with their mothers?
Dunno.
I had to unpack 4B. To quote:
"No heterosexual marriage, no heterosexual dating, no heterosexual sex, and no childbearing under any circumstances."
This is a luxury product. Poor societies know that they need a new generation. Rich societies that have the delusion that they can import workers will find they are no longer rich societies, as the culture will change.
The good news is that this will burn out, and it will the 4b ladies that will suffer.
Enforced final stage of mouse utopia.
GOP needs to message strongly that Republican woman are married, meaning they are attractive enough to extract commitment and resources from good men, where Democrat women are only good for short-term physical pleasure without commitment.
GOP Brides vs Dem Rides.
Make being a Republican woman a status symbol and you will OWN the women’s vote.
But the GOP is too stupid and craven to even think this thought.
The Dems already know this, which is why they work so hard on making American women fat, promiscuous, foul, and debt-ridden. They are manufacturing voters.
https://i.imgflip.com/99qj93.jpg
😂😂😂
@scarletnumber, I respect your decision to stay on topic. I do hope at some future point you can add some thoughtful understanding around social pressure because I think you may have some unique perspective. You are not independent. You self define as Dem, yet you read here. I am wondering how much of an outlier you are. How is it that you came to this site and failed to burst into flames? Humor aside, there is profound, wildly successful, social pressure on the Dem side for cohesion. To this independent, it looks like someone clicks a button on a remote and everyone snaps to it, regardless of how illogical, detrimental and contradictory to previous marching orders. You and others were willing to go against all of that. I hope you will reflect on that. There might be something interesting and useful to learn.
> How is it that you came to this site and failed to burst into flames? Humor aside, there is profound, wildly successful, social pressure on the Dem side for cohesion.
I also read Steve Sailer and I've felt there was an overlap in the themes of Vox Popoli and Steve's blog. The short answer to your question is that there is a sane wing in the Democratic party that doesn't necessarily believe every crackpot left-wing social-justice flavor of the month. We voted for Trump and our older brethren voted for Ronald Reagan.
I am not proud of this, but I do not post under my real name. Not only would I be ostracized from the Democratic Party but as a public employee I could very easily lose my job as well, as I don't have First Amendment rights as a practical matter.
Interesting. Well, thank you for this. I hope you do post some observations on how you can remain under all that pressure, not free to bring your whole self anywhere, choose to stay in the tribe, and yet here you are and there you voted. What ever it is that enables you and your brothers to do that, and it's not lost on me that you said brethren, there must be some kind of SSH observation that rhymes or overlaps. I don't judge you for prudence, it's the reality of human nature and a part of this social pressure story. Good luck to you.
"But the more significant aspect of the chart is that it shows that female political allegiances are malleable... more normal women, those who haven’t gone completely and irretrievably off the deep end, will tend to follow the lead of their boyfriends and husbands over time."
My wife was politically neutral when we started dating with a traditional upbringing. She is now an American Nationalist who champions repatriation and a return to Christian Blasphemy laws. Young men may be surprised how much they change over time, but it takes effort, leadership, and lots of her husband's injected jizz strength.
I was with you until that last line.