Secret King Strikes Again
Gammas seldom understand why they are disliked
The purpose of conversation and social interaction is not one-upsmanship or to contradict everything that people around you say. First, you’re not the reality police. Second, literally everyone hates it when people do either of those things, especially if they do them on a regular basis. Third, if you don’t like people doing it to you, rest assured they don’t like you doing it to them.
If I had one piece of advice for low-status men who absolutely insist on opening their mouths even when no one is asking for their advice or their opinion, it would be to excise the words “no” and “actually” from their vocabularies.
Several friends and I regularly engage in informal discussion on a Signal group chat. Topics range from politics to religion to our favorite breakfast cereal, and most of us view it all for what it is--an informal social group of friends to share news, thoughts, etc. Except for this one guy. He's friends with others on the group, but I only know him informally through the occasional party or social interaction with the others. This guy is super Gamma--believes he's an expert on everything, and that his views on whatever topic that happens to be under discussion is the mostest important and demands everyone's full attention. So much so that if you don't acknowledge his points and make an effort discuss them at length, he grows openly hostile and accuses you of arguing in bad faith. Though most of the time his position is an incomprehensible word salad and goes mostly ignored by all.
This happened so often that I decided to no longer interact with this fellow on our group chat, which apparently really irritated him. He sent me a private message asking what he could do in order that I would engage with him again in the group. My simple response was to say probably nothing, but he could start by apologizing for saying that I argue in "bad faith". His response? A 740-word wall of text dissertation on why he wasn't wrong to say that. So I just continued to ignore him. After that, he made several attempts to goad me into discussion, then resorted to insults and name calling, but when I wouldn't take the bait, he eventally rage-quit the group chat. Good riddance.
After watching the presidential debate, I am confident that the Biden administration is suffering from an infestation of Gammas.
The debate points of Biden included:
- Trump suggested drinking bleach
- Trump said bad words regarding Charlottesville
- Trump is a whiner
Typical arguments you would expect from a Gamma. Likewise, the lawfare against Trump is similar to the Wall of Text, where the Gamma must have the last word and leaves no delusion untouched.
Academic Agent has been predicting the demise of the Biden administration since the regime requires the containment of white men. The SSH furnishes a different angle, where the Gammas in Biden administration have been allowed to do Gamma things uninterrupted and no one is fooled as usual. The Gamma infestation is not unexpected as the Biden administration has been hostile to capable men, and the rampant inclusivity makes it difficult to weed out Gammas.