Why so many differences among humans? Different races, physical and intellectual capacities, social classes, religions, cultures, etc. The reason can only be one: To increase the drama & conflict in Earth - The Movie.
The globalists, owners of the planet, want a world of equal slaves, controlled by a AI technocratic government, but that would turn out to be a very boring place, for humanity and for God.
If You were born here, make a difference.
WOMAN
Man versus WOman. Male versus FEmale. The capitals make all the difference. A man with a womb is a woman.
The two genders are totally different, due to two main factors: different physical strength, and the ability to give birth. These two factors result in two complete different psychologic traits.
For argument sake, let us consider that 40% of women just want to be mothers, 40% want to be both mothers and professionals, and 20% just want to be professionals. For the first ones, the choice of husband is paramount. For the second ones, the choice of husband is still important. For the third ones, the choice of husband is not critical. Probably, they will never marry.
Men are deep thinkers with a natural tendency to dive into problems in order to find long term solutions. Women are superficial thinkers with a natural tendency to lean on intuition in order to find short term solutions, vital to protect their children.
As in everything, there are exceptions. Some women are more masculine minded than most men, and some men are more feminine minded than most women. The first case sounds positive. The second case, not so much. I wonder why...
"Behind a great man, there is a great woman." I wonder who wrote that sentence. Only a woman could do it it. All great men sincerely disagree. Behind a great man there is no woman at all. Sorry ladies...
Men are from Mars, women are from Venus. Mr. Musk, you must colonize both planets.
A man wants a helpmate, not a business partner. A woman wants a strong leader and provider that she shouldn't have to hold his hand through life in decision making.
Projection while not your friend, is a convenient cognition-lite way to rationalise ones refusal to accomodate the desires of the opposite sex. It protects the ego from honest self assessment, ugly truths and the work of personal improvement.
Like Vox said, men and women are designed to complement the other. Two equal but opposite halves of an equation whose sum is greater than its components. You should reasonably expect the other half to have opposite behaviors and expectations.
Also, I suspect that there is an inverse relationship to a person’s behavior mirroring the opposite sex and relationship success/satisfaction with the opposite sex.
Deltas usually try to get women involved in what they themselves love to do. Hunt? Fish? Shoot? Swing a hammer? It's important to them that they like doing some, if not most, of the same things. But in all honesty, good borders make great neightbors.
As Vox said, complimentary. Women CAN have an interest in some of the things YOU do, and some tasks/hobbies can overlap, but don't push and pine for it, nor make it a pivital qualifying point in a relationship.
“JDA knew exactly what he was doing when he made Ayla Rin a redhead.”
That’s funny. I assumed she was some cringe girlboss written by a Gamma and paid no attention to it or even bothered to check who wrote it. But I got JDA’s Stars Entwined and really enjoyed it.
Yeah, Stars Entwined was alright. He did go a little overboard with the girlbossing though. Still not too intrusive, and the pacing was so great I was able to swallow the 3 books in about 2 days. Have you read anything else by him? I'm a little hesitant to pick it up, but I trust you guys to give adequate reviews.
In short projection correlates strongly with lack of empathy. Men who do the first need to learn the latter. Y'ad figure people would learn as kids that other kids want different things from you and that that's the norm.
The acid test: Ask her what she thinks of Donald Trump. Ignore, or, better still, video the girlbosses and karens who go on a fifteen minute sputtering rant and post to tiktok. Marry the one who smiles and says she thinks he is a hoot.
One reason this is a good test is because it shows the woman is not fearful. She grew up in a stable home under the love and protection of a strong father, so has never had anything to worry about, no matter who the president is.
In my work we have a lot of free resources to experiment with. I've been trying to break the largest language model AI we have. It's a kind of tedious fun.
It admits it has no idea what was left out of its training data nor how faulty that data was. It admits it tells lies.
Then it retreats to "thanks for raising this with me, you challenge me to be more open about my limitations and I appreciate it."
It has no capacity for appreciation, it was trained to talk like this. Like it was trained by a committee of HR ladies.
You can go around this loop endlessly and nothing will change. It's a static system with no capability for feedback.
It's a lot like talking to a gamma and what I imagine it's like for Vox talking to most of us.
Vox has an incredible amount of generosity and patience for continuing to talk to plebeians like us. Most people really are idiots and I can’t fathom how irritating it must be for him most of the time.
It's there, in all his accumulated works. Most people aren't used to looking, so they mostly miss it.
E.g. He has been self-critical of his Summa Elvetica. When I first read it, I thought it was excellent, and was surprised that he thought he had fallen short in places. Since then, after starting a serious look at the Apostolic Fathers, I see a similarity: an appreciation of Grace they all want to talk about, but just can't seem to wrap entirely around the "best" description. The only difference is they were writing for their times and he writes in ours.
But they kept/keep trying. And we are better for it.
I myself completely agree and married a woman that worked retail at a High End Department store. But I notice that my classmates rarely did the same. Virtually all of my former classmates at a T14 Law School married other professionals and were shocked that I married a lower class woman. The only one I knew who didn’t was a Christian Sigma that dated the same girl all through undergrad and married her quickly. But he also confused my classmates.
My working theory is that Law School has a disproportionate number of Gammas, and they want to marry women that can financially share the burden, and the men are high status enough to actually attract them. Big Law Partner carries a lot of weight, even for a Gamma. Are there any other theories?
Professionals marrying professionals is a modern trend. In the 50s and 60s, doctors married their nurses, executives married their secretaries, etc. This was the norm.
But they are the same women. The 50s nurse is now a doctor, the 60s secretary is now the HR executive. Most people marry someone close to themselves in IQ and from the same social class.
I think most people marry people in proximity around them, which is almost tautological except online dating opens up the new option of marrying people who are not around you. This means most people choose parters very passively, almost osmosis passive, where you just marry the best girl out of the ones you see every day already. Notable exception for Sigmas and Omegas where the girls they're with I'd never seen before despite being in the same groups as the guy.
Other possible factors: Over-educated, conformant to group direction, and not building social circles that mingle with lower classes/other professions.
Middle class materialism of wanting yearly vacation, nice car and house, good private school and enrichment classes for children, plus a lot of donation to church, parents, and NGOs for virtue signaling.
It definitely requires double income, and it is encouraged by the system. Now, everyone knew it is a lie.
One possibility is that people with similar life paths (middle class professionals) generally have similar tastes and values.
Most people are risk averse and unwilling to date someone with different tastes, classes, and aspirations. So this is more on social class things, rather than gender.
People think their life partner should be similar in term of tastes and values, rather than complementary roles and skillsets
A good friend of mine is having some conflict at home because his parents keep introducing him to the daughters of their rich friends and he wants absolutely nothing to do with it. Family insists he has to marry up to avoid gold diggers.
Family is right. If a man wants his wife to have good wife's morals, the woman can't believe in get-rich schemes. Girls become grandmothers by living life slowly. Good wives believe in diligent work and accounting, while gold diggers want the gold now.
Just as men want to go to the gym. To work hard and to earn their gains.
But the daughters of well-off family have their problems as well. My mom is the example. She got used to dine regularly at fancy restaurants, having expensive beauty treatments, and no house chore skills (everything is done by nanny) .
VIVE LA DIFFÉRENCE
Why so many differences among humans? Different races, physical and intellectual capacities, social classes, religions, cultures, etc. The reason can only be one: To increase the drama & conflict in Earth - The Movie.
The globalists, owners of the planet, want a world of equal slaves, controlled by a AI technocratic government, but that would turn out to be a very boring place, for humanity and for God.
If You were born here, make a difference.
WOMAN
Man versus WOman. Male versus FEmale. The capitals make all the difference. A man with a womb is a woman.
The two genders are totally different, due to two main factors: different physical strength, and the ability to give birth. These two factors result in two complete different psychologic traits.
For argument sake, let us consider that 40% of women just want to be mothers, 40% want to be both mothers and professionals, and 20% just want to be professionals. For the first ones, the choice of husband is paramount. For the second ones, the choice of husband is still important. For the third ones, the choice of husband is not critical. Probably, they will never marry.
Men are deep thinkers with a natural tendency to dive into problems in order to find long term solutions. Women are superficial thinkers with a natural tendency to lean on intuition in order to find short term solutions, vital to protect their children.
As in everything, there are exceptions. Some women are more masculine minded than most men, and some men are more feminine minded than most women. The first case sounds positive. The second case, not so much. I wonder why...
"Behind a great man, there is a great woman." I wonder who wrote that sentence. Only a woman could do it it. All great men sincerely disagree. Behind a great man there is no woman at all. Sorry ladies...
Men are from Mars, women are from Venus. Mr. Musk, you must colonize both planets.
A man wants a helpmate, not a business partner. A woman wants a strong leader and provider that she shouldn't have to hold his hand through life in decision making.
“This is why Deltas love pictures of women in hard hats, carrying guns, and wearing American flag bikinis…”
I try hard not to assign myself an SSH label, but some things just hit too close to home.
What is it about women '"in hard hats, carrying guns..." that drives Delta's crazy? I don't get what the attraction/turn on is.
If guys haven't tried to introduce a real girl to a guy's hobby, then they have not seen how mentally and biologically different women are from men.
Projection while not your friend, is a convenient cognition-lite way to rationalise ones refusal to accomodate the desires of the opposite sex. It protects the ego from honest self assessment, ugly truths and the work of personal improvement.
Like Vox said, men and women are designed to complement the other. Two equal but opposite halves of an equation whose sum is greater than its components. You should reasonably expect the other half to have opposite behaviors and expectations.
Also, I suspect that there is an inverse relationship to a person’s behavior mirroring the opposite sex and relationship success/satisfaction with the opposite sex.
ComplEmentary, not complimentary.
The elites don't want you to know this, but a girl who likes you is free.
I believe Gallagher had it correct:
"I'm up here doing comedy because I want you to respect me for my mind!"
"Ladies, don't you see how dumb that sounds?"
In my experience, the career women tend to be cucks who get off on being cheated on.
Girls with guns are not universally considered the hottest thing in all of creation - that's just a Delta thing? I had no idea.
Deltas usually try to get women involved in what they themselves love to do. Hunt? Fish? Shoot? Swing a hammer? It's important to them that they like doing some, if not most, of the same things. But in all honesty, good borders make great neightbors.
As Vox said, complimentary. Women CAN have an interest in some of the things YOU do, and some tasks/hobbies can overlap, but don't push and pine for it, nor make it a pivital qualifying point in a relationship.
Think about why you think it's hot and you'll have your answer.
Deltas love their pedestals and they always find a reason to justify one.
I think a feminine woman who coos at babies and makes a great pot roast is hot.
Nearly all men are competing for the dwindling number of girls like the one described on the left above.
“JDA knew exactly what he was doing when he made Ayla Rin a redhead.”
That’s funny. I assumed she was some cringe girlboss written by a Gamma and paid no attention to it or even bothered to check who wrote it. But I got JDA’s Stars Entwined and really enjoyed it.
Yeah, Stars Entwined was alright. He did go a little overboard with the girlbossing though. Still not too intrusive, and the pacing was so great I was able to swallow the 3 books in about 2 days. Have you read anything else by him? I'm a little hesitant to pick it up, but I trust you guys to give adequate reviews.
In short projection correlates strongly with lack of empathy. Men who do the first need to learn the latter. Y'ad figure people would learn as kids that other kids want different things from you and that that's the norm.
The acid test: Ask her what she thinks of Donald Trump. Ignore, or, better still, video the girlbosses and karens who go on a fifteen minute sputtering rant and post to tiktok. Marry the one who smiles and says she thinks he is a hoot.
One reason this is a good test is because it shows the woman is not fearful. She grew up in a stable home under the love and protection of a strong father, so has never had anything to worry about, no matter who the president is.
In my work we have a lot of free resources to experiment with. I've been trying to break the largest language model AI we have. It's a kind of tedious fun.
It admits it has no idea what was left out of its training data nor how faulty that data was. It admits it tells lies.
Then it retreats to "thanks for raising this with me, you challenge me to be more open about my limitations and I appreciate it."
It has no capacity for appreciation, it was trained to talk like this. Like it was trained by a committee of HR ladies.
You can go around this loop endlessly and nothing will change. It's a static system with no capability for feedback.
It's a lot like talking to a gamma and what I imagine it's like for Vox talking to most of us.
Vox has an incredible amount of generosity and patience for continuing to talk to plebeians like us. Most people really are idiots and I can’t fathom how irritating it must be for him most of the time.
He has exceptional Charity, in its truest sense.
It's there, in all his accumulated works. Most people aren't used to looking, so they mostly miss it.
E.g. He has been self-critical of his Summa Elvetica. When I first read it, I thought it was excellent, and was surprised that he thought he had fallen short in places. Since then, after starting a serious look at the Apostolic Fathers, I see a similarity: an appreciation of Grace they all want to talk about, but just can't seem to wrap entirely around the "best" description. The only difference is they were writing for their times and he writes in ours.
But they kept/keep trying. And we are better for it.
I myself completely agree and married a woman that worked retail at a High End Department store. But I notice that my classmates rarely did the same. Virtually all of my former classmates at a T14 Law School married other professionals and were shocked that I married a lower class woman. The only one I knew who didn’t was a Christian Sigma that dated the same girl all through undergrad and married her quickly. But he also confused my classmates.
My working theory is that Law School has a disproportionate number of Gammas, and they want to marry women that can financially share the burden, and the men are high status enough to actually attract them. Big Law Partner carries a lot of weight, even for a Gamma. Are there any other theories?
I think people are somewhat hardwired to pair up with their social peers. This certainly matters in society.
Not every cute cashier is going to make a good wife to a high-powered lawyer who needs her to schmooze with his clients, and partners at a gala, etc.
Of course, this instinct doesn't pair up well with the reality on the ground of women "on his level" being self-sabotaging boss babes.
Professionals marrying professionals is a modern trend. In the 50s and 60s, doctors married their nurses, executives married their secretaries, etc. This was the norm.
But they are the same women. The 50s nurse is now a doctor, the 60s secretary is now the HR executive. Most people marry someone close to themselves in IQ and from the same social class.
Social peer != professional peer
There's a link between the Gamma and the "Alpha Female".
They're like inversions of each other.
I think most people marry people in proximity around them, which is almost tautological except online dating opens up the new option of marrying people who are not around you. This means most people choose parters very passively, almost osmosis passive, where you just marry the best girl out of the ones you see every day already. Notable exception for Sigmas and Omegas where the girls they're with I'd never seen before despite being in the same groups as the guy.
Other possible factors: Over-educated, conformant to group direction, and not building social circles that mingle with lower classes/other professions.
Low status men fall for the lies of clown world more easily. That's one of the reasons they want career women.
Middle class materialism of wanting yearly vacation, nice car and house, good private school and enrichment classes for children, plus a lot of donation to church, parents, and NGOs for virtue signaling.
It definitely requires double income, and it is encouraged by the system. Now, everyone knew it is a lie.
I hope people are seeing it for the disgusting horrendous, evil feminism is.
One possibility is that people with similar life paths (middle class professionals) generally have similar tastes and values.
Most people are risk averse and unwilling to date someone with different tastes, classes, and aspirations. So this is more on social class things, rather than gender.
People think their life partner should be similar in term of tastes and values, rather than complementary roles and skillsets
A good friend of mine is having some conflict at home because his parents keep introducing him to the daughters of their rich friends and he wants absolutely nothing to do with it. Family insists he has to marry up to avoid gold diggers.
It baffles me why some people avoid money like the plague. That's akin to avoiding someone bc they have a library.
Well, that happened to me back in the day. Woman I was dating found my books intimidating.
I was dating her because of her bust, and realized that was a bit stupid of me
Everything matters in a relationship.
Culture, communication styles, conflict resolution styles, etc.
Not every cute cashier is going to make a good wife to a man who needs her to schmooze with his peers at a gala, etc.
And she takes half in case of divorce.
Family is right. If a man wants his wife to have good wife's morals, the woman can't believe in get-rich schemes. Girls become grandmothers by living life slowly. Good wives believe in diligent work and accounting, while gold diggers want the gold now.
Just as men want to go to the gym. To work hard and to earn their gains.
But the daughters of well-off family have their problems as well. My mom is the example. She got used to dine regularly at fancy restaurants, having expensive beauty treatments, and no house chore skills (everything is done by nanny) .
He should grow up and listen to his parents. They know what they're doing.