Gamma Confirmed, Banned

This is how easy it is to spot them.

Granted, the name alone tended to make one suspicious, but from his very first comment here, Sober Christian Gentleman gave off a reek of Gamma that one could easily detect while eating surströmming on a pig farm a mile away. It was obvious what he was up to right away, but I thought I’d give him the opportunity to prove my initial observation wrong.

I don’t know why I even bother anymore, since the SSH is reliable to the point of boredom, but it seems only fair to give new visitors here a chance to acclimatize themselves to the norms in effect.

What is being described is a traditional Western man.

Want some background on the strategy to destroy the West. Weaponized migration. I explain in my podcast here:

Now, I don’t mind people letting others know about their sites or substacks, especially when it happens to be directly relevant to the topic under discussion, but not only was the connection more than a bit of a stretch, but he put up a second response to another commenter that said exactly the same thing. So, I left the first comment, deleted the second one, and then gave him a warning.

Stop trying to hijack the mic. If you continue trying to do so, you will be banned. What you think is important is not intrinsically relevant to the discourse here, even if you are correct.

First of all, while Deltas make up the majority of Western men, it is not correct to equate the subset with the set. It was therefore immediately obvious that this Christian Gentleman, however Sober, didn’t know anything at all about the SSH or this site, he was simply attracted to the amount of traffic here and was hoping to siphon some of it toward his own site.

And, of course, being a Gamma, he was too stubborn and too convinced of the righteousness of his own position to heed the warning. Instead, he resorted to the usual Gamma tactic when called out, he went into Self-Defense Lawyer mode. Gammas seldom grasp that life is not a courtroom, they have no right to be heard by anyone else, and it is the host, not the Gamma, who is judge, jury, and executioner.

Foreigners make terrible husbands from a woman's perspective. How is that not on point? Traditional liberal thinking is incompatible non-western marriage arrangements.

Being sober, Christian, and a gentleman, Sir Hamster did his best to explain.

"How is that not on point?"

Your are changing the topic to immigration to promote your own podcast.

Foreign is tangential to the question of solid Delta versus exciting but unstable boyfriend.

Western countries do not have a monopoly on solid Deltas. Non-Westerm women should consider their culture's own solid Deltas over an exciting Western foreigner boyfriend.

Your half-baked thought is not on point.

To, of course, absolutely no avail.

The West is where women are respected by default. Everywhere else looks at women as property, labour servants or herim sex rotation. Tickly point it seems.

And there it is, not that any further confirmation was necessary. You might doubt the reliability of the verbal red flags that have been pointed out to you, but you would be wrong to do so. And so it was that we reached the point that was always inevitable.

Gamma confirmed. Banned.

Gammas are like cat burglars who don’t realize it’s broad daylight.