Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Legionnaire's avatar

The lack of loyalty and guilt sticks out.

The emotional isolation is absolute. Though many view the Sigma as a close friend, the total social/emotional isolation of the young Sigma doesnt allow him to have any sense of loyalty to anyone, be it male or female. Through many years and after making enemies of many high status men, he eventually learns (hopefully) that though he feels no social/emotional obligation to others, they (the others) coming from normal hierarchy expectations, will always expect the same of him and it isnt their fault. People claim to want to be a Sigma, but as with the Alpha bearing all the responsibility of the success and failure of the hierarchy, the experience of total social isolation of the Sigma is not something any person should ever desire, and isnt something one can choose by desire. It is something they are stuck with, whether they want it or not.

Coffee Guy Chris's avatar

I’ve always found to interesting how neutral the SSH is. There really is no good guy or bad guy here. Just men acting according to their priorities. The other day Vox mentioned how C.S. Lewis—one of my favorite authors!—was a “good” Gamma, and I was shocked to learn that not all Gammas are necessarily wicked people. Similar to how most CEOs are Alphas or Sigmas since that’s what the job requires, but some are moral and others are immoral, again acting according to their truest desires.

106 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?