In Haruki Murakami’s book Blind Willow, Sleeping Woman there is a remarkable portrait of a sigma in his short story “Nausea 1979”.
I knew this young illustrator from the time he did a drawing for a story I published in a certain magazine. He was a few years younger than I, but we shared an interest in collecting old jazz LPs. Another thing he liked to do was sleep with his friends’ girlfriends and wives. There had been quite a number of them over the years, and often he would fill me in on his exploits. He had even done it a few times while the friend was out buying beer or was taking a shower during one of his visits.
“You do it as fast as you can, with most of your clothes on,” he said. “Ordinary sex can drag on and on, right? So once in a while you take exactly the opposite approach. It gives you a whole new perspective. It’s fun.”
This kind of tour de force was not the only kind of sex that interested him, of course. He could enjoy it the slow, old-fashioned way, too. But it was the act of sleeping with his friends’ girlfriends and wives that really turned him on… I found it hard to believe that such things could be carried off so easily, but he didn’t seem the type to spout a lot of nonsense just to make himself look good, so I began to think he might be right.
“And finally, most of the women have been looking for something like this.... What they want is for somebody to be interested in them beyond the—in a sense—static framework of ‘girlfriend’ or ‘wife.’ That’s the most fundamental rule in all this. Of course, on a more superficial level, their motives are all over the map.”
“For example?”
“For example, getting even with a husband for fooling around, or boredom, or the sheer satisfaction of attracting another man. That kind of thing. I just have to look at them to know. It’s not a question of learning a technique. This is strictly an inborn talent. You either have it or you don’t.”
He did not have a steady girlfriend himself.
What is interesting is that Murakami accurately describes many of the attributes of a Sigma decades before the concept was first articulated. The young illustrator is solitary, but successful with women despite being physically unremarkable, is likable and makes friends easily, but has little interest in a social life. He possesses unusual motivations and preferences, has strong willpower and a high level of self-discipline, and exists almost completely outside the normal social hierarchies. His interests fall on the obsessive side. He understands women on a level few men do, but has very little interest in them beyond their sexual utility for him and is more inclined to view them with contempt than place them on a pedestal. Relationships, both friendly and romantic, are open to him, but he instinctively shies away from them.
Murakami’s example also points to the intrinsic amorality of men’s social status, as well as the Sigma’s customary indifference toward the feelings of others. Whereas the Alpha or the Delta will at least be somewhat restrained by the potential consequences of his actions for the hierarchy, only the Gamma will effortlessly manage to wreak such widespread destruction in pursuit of his individual priorities.
This serves as a useful reminder that the SSH is not a construct or an original creation. It is a taxonomy of existing and behavioral patterns that have been observable for centuries, if not millennia.
The lack of loyalty and guilt sticks out.
The emotional isolation is absolute. Though many view the Sigma as a close friend, the total social/emotional isolation of the young Sigma doesnt allow him to have any sense of loyalty to anyone, be it male or female. Through many years and after making enemies of many high status men, he eventually learns (hopefully) that though he feels no social/emotional obligation to others, they (the others) coming from normal hierarchy expectations, will always expect the same of him and it isnt their fault. People claim to want to be a Sigma, but as with the Alpha bearing all the responsibility of the success and failure of the hierarchy, the experience of total social isolation of the Sigma is not something any person should ever desire, and isnt something one can choose by desire. It is something they are stuck with, whether they want it or not.
I’ve always found to interesting how neutral the SSH is. There really is no good guy or bad guy here. Just men acting according to their priorities. The other day Vox mentioned how C.S. Lewis—one of my favorite authors!—was a “good” Gamma, and I was shocked to learn that not all Gammas are necessarily wicked people. Similar to how most CEOs are Alphas or Sigmas since that’s what the job requires, but some are moral and others are immoral, again acting according to their truest desires.