The Inevitable Gamma
They can't stop demonstrating the truth of the SSH
It never changes. A Gamma appears, reads two or three posts, is immediately triggered by recognizing his low status and realizing that it is not as hidden from everyone as he assumed it would be, and promptly engages in a campaign against the SSH and its author because it punctured his delusion bubble and made him feel bad about himself.
It never changes. Yesterday was not the first time and it will not be the last.
Your cult simply can’t be told anything by anyone. Even the slightest, most innocent challenge to your bunk “theory” is taken as a mortal insult and handled accordingly.
Your theory is in fact a crock of shit, as this thread demonstrates, with limited predictive power. It’s mostly just a cudgel you use to bludgeon anyone who dares challenge your cult leader. Anyone who challenges you is defined by your theory as a “gamma” and therefore not worth listening to. How convenient.
You completely lack introspection into your true nature, insisting on doubling down on stupid rather than engaging in any kind of reflection whatsoever.
It’s really a fascinating case study. Classic cult behavior.
Well, as I’ve said before, as cults go, it’s a very affordable one. It’s not terribly demanding either; all one really has to do is behave as per the standard etiquette practices as defined by Emily Post and communicate in a civil manner.
Of course, that’s well beyond the average Gamma, particularly a Gamma in a triggered state.
It seems a lot of people do indeed care, judging by the angry and upset responses to completely innocent comments.
No, I have in fact never heard of this guy before this day. Does this fact bother you for some reason?
And not only am I against Vox (apparently, since questioning Dear Leader’s Teachings is forbidden here), I’m also against Jesus too? And you wonder why the word “cult” keeps coming up time and again.
So if I’m reading this right: your cult has apparently decided that “Sigma” is the coveted status to attain, and apparently this is only reached by group consensus, or by decree from Dear Leader?
So you imagine that my purpose here is a vain and pointless search for recognition of my Sigma-ness, as you folks aren’t fooled, no sir?
Nope--you know exactly how to label and classify me, and the outcome of that is predetermined by your crock of shit theory: is this guy challenging the Religion in any way? Yes? Then he’s a gamma. Case closed. Everyone pile on and let’s beat and kick the bad gamma.
Right?
Please, keep pretending like I haven’t just nailed you Kool-Aid drinkers to the cross.
I’m sure you’re all every bit as surprised as I was. It was obvious from his very first comment that he was going to end up descending into vulgar walls of text before being banned, but I thought that his antics might serve as a useful reminder of why you must always eject Gammas from your organization.
Can you even imagine the alarm of the woman trying to fend off his expressions of interest, knowing that no matter what she does, the inevitable rage-spiral is coming? I think it’s a lot easier for men to understand preemptive female defensiveness once they get a clear picture of what Gamma behavior actually is.



I don't think he quite understood what is discussed here. But he certainly had a very colorful interpretation to share!
And it's not "Stupendous Dear Leader", it's "Supreme Dark Lord". He can't even get the cult leader's title correct. He was never gonna fit in.
That guy's Sigma envy is on full blast.